The data below represent everything available in the MBMG Abandoned and Inactive Mines (AIM) database.
AIM Id | Name | Alternate Name | District | County |
---|---|---|---|---|
BE003895 | STINSON MINE | VIRGINIA GULCH | ARGENTA | BEAVERHEAD |
MRDS | AMLI | MILS | Latitude | Longitude | Datum |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
01-105 | 300010457 | 45.315 | -112.9233 |
Township | Range | Section | QSection | UTM Northing | UTM Easting | UTM Zone | UTM Datum |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
06S | 11W | 14 | BCBA | 5019525 | 349240 | 12 |
Average Elevation | Elev Units | Land Owner | 250K Quad | 100K Quad | 24K Quad |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6898 | F | NF | DILLON | DILLON | ERMONT |
Property Type | Update Date | Who Updated |
---|---|---|
LODE | 4/6/1995 | JEW |
Commodities Identified |
---|
GOLD LEAD SILVER |
Information |
---|
Agency: NF Region District: R1 Ranger District: DILLON Forest Service Tract: Watershed Code: 10020002 Forest or Resource Area: BEAVERHEAD Owner: N Impact: Report: Stinson (BE003895) The Stinson Mine consists of 2 bulldozer cuts, a caved adit (between the cuts), and a large dump. Total surface disturbance is about 1 acre. The Stinson explores a cross-fault in the Devonian Jefferson Formation; the fault strikes N80E and dips 40N to 70N (Geach, 1972). The fault was exposed at 2 points underground; gouge was rubbery and stained black with manganese oxide. An altered quartz latite dike was also exposed underground and cross-cut about 46' south of the fault zone (Geach, 1972). Ore minerals included lead, manganese, silver, and gold. A chip sample from the gouge zone assayed 0.50% lead, 3.30% manganese, 0.45 ounces silver, and 0.001 ounces gold. Minor limonite staining was noted on the dump rocks; brown and reddish-brown jasper was also observed and was probably part of the gangue mineralogy. Production figures for this mine are confidential; judging from the volume of waste rock in the dump, production was modest. Little information exists regarding exact dates of operation; it is known that this mine was producing in 1961 and 1963 (Geach, 1972). This dry site is situated on a south-facing hillside above a dry gulch; there is no water component. The workings are located on USFS land. Geach included a plan map of the workings in his 1972 publication. |
Information |
---|
Mill Tailings: N Adit Discharge: N Metal Leaching: N Water Erosion: N Residence: N Hazardous Materials: N Open Adit: N Visit: Y Comments: MBMG GEOLOGIST: JACK WATSON (6/3/94); PHOTOS 2-1 AND 2-2 |
Information |
---|
Investigator: J. WATSON Date: 6/3/1994 Photos Available?: Access: Nearest Wetlands/Bog: Drainage Basin: FRENCH CREEK Water Contact Stream: Nearest Surface Water Intake: Number of Surface Water Intake(s) observed within 15 miles downstream: Uses of Surface Water Intake(s) observed within 15 miles downstream: Nearest Wells (miles): Number of Wells within 4 miles: Uses of Wells within 4 miles: Nearest Dwelling (miles): Number of Months Occupied: Number of Houses within 2 miles: Recreational Usage on Site: Nearest Recreational Area (miles): Name or Type of Recreational Area: Safety Risk from Open Adit/Shaft: Safety Risk from Highwall or Unstable Slopes: Safety Risk from Unstable Structures: Safety Risk from Chemicals: Safety Risk from Solid Waste (includes sharp rusted items): Safety Risk from Explosives: Sensitive Environments within 2 miles of Site or 15 miles Downstream: Population within 0-0.25 miles: Population within 0.25-0.5 miles: Population within 0.5-1 miles: Population within 1-2 miles: Population within 2-3 miles: Population within 3-4 miles: Public Interest: |
End of report. Retrieved 8/24/2024 11:40:30 PM.
The preceding materials represent the contents of the databases at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology at the time and date of the retrieval. The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a daily basis. The Bureau warrants the accurate transmission of the data to the original end user at the time and date of the retrieval. Retransmission of the data to other users is discouraged and the Bureau claims no responsibility if the material is retransmitted. There may be data in the request area that are not recorded at the Bureau.