The data below represent everything available in the MBMG Abandoned and Inactive Mines (AIM) database.
AIM Id | Name | Alternate Name | District | County |
---|---|---|---|---|
MA006812 | URBANE | TIDAL WAVE | MADISON |
MRDS | AMLI | MILS | Latitude | Longitude | Datum |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
300570229 | 45.5656 | -112.1997 |
Township | Range | Section | QSection | UTM Northing | UTM Easting | UTM Zone | UTM Datum |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
03S | 05W | 22 | AACB |
Average Elevation | Elev Units | Land Owner | 250K Quad | 100K Quad | 24K Quad |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6700 | F | NF | DILLON | BUTTE SOUTH | OLD BALDY MOUNTAIN |
Property Type | Update Date | Who Updated |
---|---|---|
LODE | 1/9/1997 | RKM |
Commodities Identified |
---|
GOLD SILVER |
Information |
---|
Agency: NF Region District: R1 Ranger District: SHERIDAN Forest Service Tract: Watershed Code: 10020005 Forest or Resource Area: BEAVERHEAD Owner: N Impact: L Report: Urbane (MA006812) The Urbane workings, as investigated in 1994, consist of 1 caved adit, 1 open adit, and accompanying dumps. Workings are located on the north side of north Goodrich Gulch. Total surface disturbance is less than 1 acre. Host rock is Precambrian Pony Gneiss (granite, tonalite, and gabbro gneiss). Quartz veins up to 1/2" thick are visible in some of the dump rock and no doubt acted as the gangue. The only obvious indication of mineralization is iron-oxide staining (especially on the upper dump where drier conditions prevail). One gabbro gneiss sample was found with pyrite inclusions. Johns (1961) indicated the lower adit was on a brecciated fault zone trending N20E and dipping 45-50W. Gold and silver ore was purportedly produced here (Johns, 1961). An AIM sample assayed 104 ppm lead, 94 ppm zinc, 83 ppm copper, 0.6 ppm silver, trace gold, and 6 ppm arsenic. Information on operational history and production was not found in the literature. Judging from the size of the dumps, production was small. All workings are on USFS land. The lowest dump lies perpendicular to a small creek and dams it. Johns 1961 plan map was modified to show surface drainage. |
Information |
---|
Sample Id: WGUR-1 Material Type: WA Sample Method: COMP Comments: EQUALS WGVR-1 ON ASSAY SHEETS |
Type | Condition | Ground Water | Photos Available? | Photo Numbers | Ownership | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A01 | INTACT | NO | Y | 96-2-7 (RKM), 6-8 (JEW) | NF | THIS IS THE LOWER ADIT, CLOSE TO THE STREAM |
A02 | COLP | NO | N | NF |
Sample Id | Sampler | pH | SC | Date | TempC | Flow Rate | Flow Units | Flow Method | Source | Ind No | Veg | Stain | Salt | Sulf | Turb | Location Related to Stream | Stream | Sedimention | Photos Available? | Photo Numbers | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JRIS10H | RKM | 6.6 | 468 | 8/29/1996 | 8.1 | 6.7 | GPM | BUCKET | STREAM | N | N | N | N | N | UP | N FK GOODRICH GULCH | NO | Y | 96-2-10 | UPSTREAM OF RICHMOND; URBANE; AND BISMUTH SITES | |
JRIS20H | RKM | 8.1 | 512 | 8/29/1996 | 9.9 | 9.3 | GPM | BUCKET | STREAM | N | N | N | N | N | DOWN | N FK GOODRICH GULCH | NO | Y | 96-2-14 | DOWNSTREAM OF RICHMOND; URBANE; AND BISMUTH SITES. |
Information |
---|
Mill Tailings: N Adit Discharge: N Metal Leaching: Y Water Erosion: Y Residence: N Hazardous Materials: N Open Adit: Y Visit: Y Comments: MBMG GEOLOGIST: JACK WATSON (7/2/95); PHOTOS 6-8 AND 6-9 |
Sample Id | Source | Date | Sampler | Sample Type | L Transect | Soil Interval | Indicator of contamination | Path | Veg | Color | Salt | Photos Available? | Photo Numbers |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JRID10L | WA | 8/29/1996 | RKM | COMP | 0-6" | N | Y | N | N | Y |
Type | Wind Erosion | Veg | Rill | Gully | Seep | Pond | Breach | None | Stability | Floodplain | Dist Stream | Photos Available? | Photo Numbers |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WA01 | LOW | MOD | N | N | N | Y | N | LOW | IN | 0 | Y |
Sample | Material Type | Sample Method | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
GUR10H | WA | COMP | COMPOSITE SAMPLE OF DUMP NEAR CREEK |
Type | Latitude | Longitude | UTM_N | UTM_E | UTM_Z | Size Open Length | Size Open Width | Elevation | Elevation Units |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A01 | 4' | ||||||||
A02 |
Information |
---|
Investigator: R. MARVIN Date: 8/29/1996 Photos Available?: Y Access: 4W Nearest Wetlands/Bog: 1 Drainage Basin: GOODRICH GULCH Water Contact Stream: Y Nearest Surface Water Intake: 10 Number of Surface Water Intake(s) observed within 15 miles downstream: Uses of Surface Water Intake(s) observed within 15 miles downstream: IRRIGATION/STOCK Nearest Wells (miles): 4 Number of Wells within 4 miles: 1 Uses of Wells within 4 miles: DOMESTIC Nearest Dwelling (miles): 4 Number of Months Occupied: Number of Houses within 2 miles: 0 Recreational Usage on Site: L Nearest Recreational Area (miles): 10 Name or Type of Recreational Area: FISHING AND CAMPING ON THE JEFFERSON RIVER Safety Risk from Open Adit/Shaft: Y Safety Risk from Highwall or Unstable Slopes: Safety Risk from Unstable Structures: N Safety Risk from Chemicals: Safety Risk from Solid Waste (includes sharp rusted items): Y Safety Risk from Explosives: Sensitive Environments within 2 miles of Site or 15 miles Downstream: Population within 0-0.25 miles: 0 Population within 0.25-0.5 miles: 0 Population within 0.5-1 miles: 0 Population within 1-2 miles: 0 Population within 2-3 miles: 0 Population within 3-4 miles: 0 Public Interest: L |
Sample Id | Lab Id | Description | Project | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
JRID10L | 97S0010 | URBANE AND BISMUTH MINES | BHFORST |
End of report. Retrieved 8/24/2024 11:30:56 PM.
The preceding materials represent the contents of the databases at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology at the time and date of the retrieval. The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a daily basis. The Bureau warrants the accurate transmission of the data to the original end user at the time and date of the retrieval. Retransmission of the data to other users is discouraged and the Bureau claims no responsibility if the material is retransmitted. There may be data in the request area that are not recorded at the Bureau.